NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wells v R [2024] NSWCCA 8 Hearing dates: 24 November 2023 Date of orders: 14 February 2024 Decision date: 14 February 2024 Before: Ward P at [1]; Button J at [120]; Ierace J at [121] Decision: 1. Extend time for the filing of the notice of appeal to 29 September 2023 and give leave for the appeal against sentence. 2. Uphold ground 3 of the appeal. 3. Quash the order of the sentencing judge in relation to the period of disqualification for sequence 4. 4. Disqualify the applicant for 1 year and 92 days. 5. Confirm the disqualification period for sequence 3 (s 166 matter), to be served concurrently with the disqualification period the subject of order 4 above. 6. Otherwise dismiss the appeal against sentence. Catchwords: SENTENCING – appeal against sentence – aggravating factors – dangerous driving occasioning death – moral culpability – objective seriousness – where the applicant was "showing off" his vehicle; grossly disregarded the speed limit and was found to have engaged in aggressive driving Legislation Cited: Crime (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 21A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 52A Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 166 Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW), ss 205, 206B Cases Cited: Battersby v R [2018] NSWCCA 141 Baumer v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 51; [1988] HCA 67 Bombardieri v R [2010] NSWCCA 161 Conte v R [2018] NSWCCA 209 DS v R; DM v R (2022) 109 NSWLR 82; [2022] NSWCCA 156 Gonzalez v R [2006] NSWCCA 4 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Kerr v R [2016] NSWCCA 218 Lehn v R (2016) 93 NSWLR 205; [2016] NSWCCA 255 Magro v R [2020] NSWCCA 25 McClelland v R [2019] NSWCCA 59 Moodie v R [2020] NSWCCA 160; (2020) 284 A Crim R 87 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Nealon v R [2021] NSWCCA 286 Norouzi v R [2020] NSWCCA 237 Paterson v R [2021] NSWCCA 273 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; (2009) 195 A Crim R 1 R v Bortic [2021] NSWCCA 138 R v Eaton [2023] NSWCCA 125 R v Elkassir [2013] NSWCCA 181 R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566; [2006] NSWCCA 242 R v Shashati [2018] NSWCCA 167 R v Tadman [2001] NSWCCA 225 R v Wells [2022] NSWDC 748 R v Wright [2013] NSWCCA 82 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267; [2001] HCA 21 Salafia v R [2015] NSWCCA 141 SB v R [2022] NSWCCA 164 Simpson v R [2019] NSWCCA 137 Smith v R [2011] NSWCCA 290 Tepania v R [2018] NSWCCA 247 TM v R [2018] NSWCCA 88 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Whyte v R (2002) 55 NSWLR 252; [2002] NSWCCA 343 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael James Wells (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Bashir SC (Applicant) M England (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate