NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rosenberg v Bloom [2024] NSWSC 114 Hearing dates: 22 August 2023 Date of orders: 15 February 2024 Decision date: 15 February 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: McGrath J Decision: See [108] Catchwords: SUCCESSION — probate and administration — application for appointment of administrator pendente lite pursuant to s 73 of the Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW) or the inherent jurisdiction of the court — HELD — not necessary nor appropriate in the circumstances for court to appoint an administrator pendente lite SUCCESSION — probate and administration —application for order preventing executor from using estate funds for legal expenses in the future — HELD — executor entitled to be indemnified by the estate for costs incurred as an incident of the administration of the trust estate SUCCESSION — probate and administration —application for order requiring executor to repay estate funds already used for legal expenses — HELD — executor not obliged to repay money spent from the estate on legal expenses Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW) Cases Cited: Drummond v Drummond [1999] NSWSC 923 Estate Kouvakas; Lucas v Konakas [2014] NSWSC 786 Estate of Ritossa [2022] NSWSC 1083 Goodsall v Keen [2006] NSWSC 1143 Gooley v Gooley [2020] NSWSC 798 Greenway v McKay (1911) 12 CLR 310; [1911] HCA 25 Kozak v Berwecki [2008] NSWSC 39 Miller v Cameron (1936) 54 CLR 572; [1936] HCA 13 O'Brien v McCormick [2005] NSWSC 619 Rattigan v Hanly [2020] NSWSC 1722 Ritossa v Ritossa [2023] NSWCA 14 The Estate of Alberto Magri (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1779 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ildiko Rosenberg (Plaintiff/Cross-defendant/First Respondent) Yonah Bloom (First Defendant/First Cross-claimant/ Second Respondent) Judit Albecz (Second Defendant/Second Cross-claimant/Applicant) David Warwick Johnson (Third Defendant/Third Cross-claimant/Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: E Glover (Plaintiff/Cross-defendant/First Respondent) L Ellison SC with P Muscat (First Defendant/First Cross-claimant/Second Respondent) B Oliak (Second Defendant/Second Cross-claimant/ Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate