NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chalik v Chalik [2024] NSWSC 117 Hearing dates: 24, 26, 27 April, 24 May, 6 and 26 July 2023 Date of orders: 16 February 2024 Decision date: 16 February 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Henry J Decision: See at [536] Catchwords: SUCCESSION – Contested probate – validity of will excluding second of two sons – Testamentary capacity – deceased struggled with memory and taking care of herself – whether evidence showed significant cognitive decline in deceased – what weight to give expert report on capacity – what weight to give evidence of solicitor who made will –consideration of statement of reasons – Lack knowledge and approval – brief and simple will – where solicitor and deceased spoke neither English nor deceased's native language when making will – Undue influence – where first son was deceased's live-in carer – dominant and controlling – whether circumstances allowed inference of pressure or coercion – distinction between undue influence in probate and equity SUCCESSION – Probate and administration – extent of estate – whether either son owes debt to deceased's estate – unattested deed of loan between deceased and second son – whether enforceable as contract – whether consideration present – whether loan actually paid – whether intention to create legal relations – limitation period – where first son was deceased's guardian and power of attorney and withdrew funds for his own use – whether funds were loans or improper withdrawals SUCCESSION – Family provision – Claim by adult child in case will found invalid – moderate estate entirely in cash – last valid will divided estate equally between sons – interim provision to first son – where first son deceased's long-term carer – close relationship – poor employment prospects – 60 years old – dominant and controlling during deceased's old age – whether to make order for final provision – whether proceedings commenced within time Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 38 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56, 98 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 140 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) s 14(1)(a) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) ss 58, 59(1)(c), 60(1)(b), 60(2), 61(1) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 42.1, 42.2 and 42.20 Cases Cited: Alexakis v Masters (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 509 Antov v Bokan [2018] NSWSC 1474 Ballam v Ferro (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1358 Bear v Bear; Jordan v Bear [2022] NSWSC 1687 Blendell v Blendell [2020] NSWCA 154 Blendell v Byrne [2019] NSWSC 583 Bracher v Jones [2020] NSWSC 1024 Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457; [1998] HCA 66 Burns v Burns [2016] WTLR 755; [216] EWCA Civ 37 Chan v Chan [2016] NSWCA 222 Chant v Curcuruto [2021] NSWSC 751 Chapple v Wilcox (2014) 87 NSWLR 646; [2014] NSWCA 392 Chidiac v Maatouk [2010] NSWSC 386 Croft v Sanders [2019] NSWCA 303 Dickman v Holley; Estate of Simpson [2013] NSWSC 18 Estate of Janakievska [2011] NSWSC 1275 Estate of Simpson [2013] NSWSC 18 Estate of Guamani; Guamani v De Cruzado [2023] NSWSC 502 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Goldberg v Landerer [2010] NSWSC 1431 Grant v Roberts; Smith v Smith; Roberts v Smith; Curtis v Smith [2019] NSWSC 843 Hall v Hall (1868) LR1P&D 481 Heyward v Fisher (Court of Appeal (NSW), Kirby P, 26 April 1985, unrep) Hoff v Atherton [2003] EWCA Civ 1554 Kalaf v Grimanes [2013] WASC 327 Lewis v Condon [2013] NSWCA 204 Lim v Lim [2022] NSWSC 454 Lim v Lim [2023] NSWCA 84 Limberger v Limberger; Oakman v Limberger [2021] NSWSC 474 Ling v Beyond Development Group Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 685 Megerditchian v Khatchadourian [2020] NSWCA 229 Mekhail v Hana; Mekail v Hana [2019] NSWCA 197 Mendonca v Legal Services Commissioner [2020] NSWCA 84 Meres v Meres [2017] NSWSC 285 Mohareb v Saratoga Marine Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 235 Nicholson v Knaggs [2009] VSC 64 Nock v Austin (1918) 25 CLR 519; [1918] HCA 73 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Page v Page [2017] NSWCA 141; (2017) 16 ASTLR 331 Plunkett v Bull (1915) 19 CLR 544; [1915] HCA 14 Quek v Beggs (1990) 5 BPR 11,761 Re Estate Rofe [2021] NSWSC 257 Re the Estate of Hodges Deceased: Shorter v Hodges (1988) 14 NSWLR 698 Romascu v Manolache [2011] NSWSC 1362 Roscorla v Thomas (1842) 114 ER 496 Salvation Army v Becker [2007] NSWCA 136 Schrader v Schrader [2013] All ER (D) 89 (Mar) Schrader v Schrader [2013] All ER (D) 89 (Mar); [2013] EWHC 466 Sgro v Thompson [2017] NSWCA 326 Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201; [1994] HCA 40 Slack v Rogan; Palffy v Rogan (2013) 85 NSWLR 253; [2013] NSWSC 522 Squire v Squire [2019] NSWCA 90 Steinmetz v Shannon (2019) 99 NSWLR 687; [2019] NSWCA 114 Stone v Stone [2019] NSWSC 233 Tobin v Ezekiel (2012) 83 NSWLR 757; [2012] NSWCA 285 Tobin v Ezekiel (2012) 83 NSWLR 757; [2012] NSWCA 285 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165; [2004] HCA 52 Underwood v Gaudron [2015] NSWCA 269 Veall v Veall (2015) 46 VR 123; [2015] VSCA 60 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191 Walker v Walker [1996] NSWSC 188 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Wingrove v Wingrove (1885) 11 PB 81 Winter v Crichton; Estate of Galieh (1991) 23 NSWLR 116 Zorbas v Sidiropoulous (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 197 Texts Cited: Nicholas Seddon, Seddon on Deeds (2nd ed, 2022, Federation Press) at [1.6] and [2.9] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Proceedings 2021/296823
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate