NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Care A2 Plus Pty Ltd v Pichardo [2024] NSWCA 35 Hearing dates: 4-5 December 2023 Date of orders: 22 February 2024 Decision date: 22 February 2024 Before: Bell CJ at [1]; Stern JA at [203]; Basten AJA at [204] Decision: 1. Appeal allowed in part with respect to the First Respondent, Karla Patricia Pichardo. 2. Set aside orders 9 and 10 entered on 14 February 2023 so far as they refer to the First Respondent. 3. In lieu thereof, order that the First Respondent pay the Appellants amounts totalling $1,090,000 together with interest from the date of payments by the Appellants to DCA Sydney Enterprises Pty Ltd calculated in accordance with the rates provided under s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW). 4. Order that the First Respondent pay the Appellants an amount of $30,000 by way of exemplary damages. 5. Order that the First Respondent be jointly liable with the Second Respondent in respect of the Appellants' costs of the cross-claim before the primary judge. 6. Order that the First Respondent pay the Appellants' costs of the appeal. Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW — misleading and deceptive conduct — whether Chief Financial Officer of small proprietary company was a mere conduit of misrepresentations — causation CONSUMER LAW — misleading and deceptive conduct — knowing involvement — requisite degree of knowledge TORTS — deceit — exemplary damages Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law ss 2, 18, 236 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 100 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 140 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52 Cases Cited: Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes (2023) 111 NSWLR 304; [2023] NSWCA 88 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v SensaSlim Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 5) [2014] FCA 340; (2014) 98 ACSR 347 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640; [2013] HCA 54 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Narain (2008) 169 FCR 211; [2008] FCAFC 120 Bathurst Regional Council v Local Government Financial Services Pty Ltd (No 5) [2012] FCA 1200 Benlist Pty Ltd v Olivetti Australia Pty Ltd (1990) ATPR 41-043 Borzi Smythe Pty Ltd v Campbell Holdings (NSW) Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 233 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592; [2004] HCA 60 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304; [2009] HCA 25 CH Real Estate Pty Ltd v Jainran Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 37 Crouch v Bloody Mary Group Pty Ltd [2020] SASC 68 Dartberg Pty Ltd v Wealthcare Financial Planning Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] FCA 1153; (2009) 74 ACSR 373 Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31; [1993] ATPR 41-203 Demetrios v Gikas Dry Cleaning Industries Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 561 Fabcot Pty Ltd v Port Macquarie-Hastings Council [2011] NSWCA 167 Gipps v Gipps [1978] 1 NSWLR 454 Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2013) 249 CLR 435; [2013] HCA 1 Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215; [1985] HCA 75 Granitigard Pty Ltd v Termicide Pest Control Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 81; (2011) 281 ALR 1 Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd (2003) 56 NSWLR 298; [2003] NSWCA 10 Havyn Pty Ltd v Webster [2005] NSWCA 182 Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459; [2001] HCA 52 Hill v James [2004] NSWSC 55 Holmes v Jones (1907) 4 CLR 1692; [1907] HCA 35 I & L Securities Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd (2002) 210 CLR 109; [2002] HCA 41 James v Hill [2004] NSWCA 301 Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 564; [2000] FCA 1572 Krakowski v Eurolynx Properties Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 563; [1995] HCA 68 Magill v Magill (2006) 226 CLR 551; [2006] HCA 51 Medical Benefits Fund of Australia Ltd v Cassidy (2003) 135 FCR 1; [2003] FCAFC 289 Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 357; [2010] HCA 31 Musca v Astle Corporation Pty Ltd (1988) 80 ALR 251; [1988] ATPR 40-855 Nadinic v Drinkwater [2020] NSWCA 2 Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191; [1982] HCA 44 Richard v Gendore Enterprises Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 116 Rookes v Barnard [1964] 1 All ER 367 State of NSW v Ibbett [2005] NSWCA 445 Sutton v AJ Thompson Pty Ltd (in liq) (1987) 73 ALR 233 Trade Practices Commission v Manfal (No 3) (1991) 33 FCR 382; (1991) 105 ALR 520 Volunteer Eco Students Abroad Pty Ltd v Reach Out Volunteers Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 731; (2013) 102 IPR 161 Wormald v Maradaca Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 289 XL Petroleum (NSW) Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd (1985) 155 CLR 448; [1985] HCA 12 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661; [1985] HCA 65 Texts Cited: Colin Lockhart, The Law of Misleading or Deceptive Conduct (5th ed, 2018, LexisNexis) David Rolph et al, Balkin & Davis: Law of Torts (6th ed, 2021, LexisNexis) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Care A2 Plus Pty Ltd (First Appellant) Care A2 Australia Pty Ltd (Second Appellant) Karla Patricia Pichardo (First Respondent) Dylan Charles Azzopardi (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate