NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Robertson v R [2024] NSWCCA 22 Hearing dates: 6 December 2023 Decision date: 28 February 2024 Before: Harrison CJ at CL at [1]; Wilson J at [2]; Ierace J at [3] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal; (2) Allow the appeal on grounds 1 and 2; (3) Quash the sentence imposed on the applicant by Judge McLennan in the District Court on 24 May 2022; (4) In lieu thereof, resentence the applicant to a term of imprisonment for a period of 4 years and 6 months, backdated to commence on 22 April 2021 and to expire on 21 October 2025, with a non-parole period of 2 years and 11 months, to expire on 21 March 2024. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — Application for leave to appeal — Supply of not less than commercial quantity of drug — Where applicant supplied significantly lower quantities of drugs prior to the involvement of police undercover operative — Whether sentencing judge erred in assessing the objective seriousness of the offence on the basis that it was designed to accrue a financial benefit CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — Where sentencing judge took account of the applicant's background of profound childhood deprivation as part of instinctive synthesis but refused to reduce the applicant's moral culpability — Whether the sentencing judge failed to correctly apply the principles of Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571 Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 3A, 5(1), 25D(2)(a), 32, 33 Drug (Misuse and Trafficking) Act 1985 (NSW) ss 10(1), 25(1),(2), 32(1)(c),(g) Cases Cited: Baines v R [2023] NSWCCA 302 Bugmy v R (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 CDPP v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Chiarlini v R [2023] NSWCCA 227 Cicciarello v R [2009] NSWCCA 272 Harris v R [2023] NSWCCA 174 Hejazi v R [2009] NSWCCA 282 Hoskins v R [2021] NSWCCA 169 House v The King 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Parente v R [2017] NSWCCA 284 Quayle v R [2010] NSWCCA 16 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 Taysavang v R; Lee v R [2017] NSWCCA 146 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bodene Robertson (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Roy (Applicant) J Styles (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate