NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: HARTNETT v TRUSTEES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH FOR THE DIOCESE OF WILCANNIA-FORBES (No 5) [2024] NSWSC 148 Hearing dates: 5 - 19 February 2024 Date of orders: 10 February 2024 Decision date: 19 February 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: Reject the defendants' objection to Ms Margaret Dixon giving oral evidence in reply, subject to the scope of Ms Dixon's evidence being limited to topics raised in Sister Green's evidence Catchwords: EVIDENCE – course of evidence – evidence in reply – credibility rule – where the scope of proposed evidence is broader than the evidence it seeks to address – proposed evidence relevant for a non-hearsay purpose Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 60, 97, 106 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Albert John Hartnett (Plaintiff) Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Wilcannia-Forbes (First Defendant) Trustee of the Marist Brothers (Second Defendant) Mercy Support Limited (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: E Romaniuk SC with J Masur (Plaintiff) M Robinson (First Defendant) M Slattery (Solicitor) (Second Defendant) D Lloyd SC with D Stretton (Third Defendant)
Solicitors: North Star Law (Plaintiff) Dentons Australia Limited (First Defendant) Carroll & O'Dea Lawyers (Second Defendant) Mills Oakley (Third Defendant) File Number(s): 2022/288425
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate