NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Frank v Angell [2024] NSWSC 158 Hearing dates: 15-16 November 2023, last submissions 20 November 2023 Date of orders: 1 March 2024 Decision date: 01 March 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Succession & Probate List - Family Provision Before: Rees J Decision: Summons dismissed with costs. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – family provision – deceased provides rent-free accommodation and interest-free loans to Solomon Islands couple, to obtain education in Australia – couple and their children living in deceased's home when he died – plaintiffs receive $50,000 under Will plus forgiveness of $80,000 debt and one year's rent-free accommodation – deceased's children unable to provide personal care for a time given COVID-19 lockdowns and son stranded overseas – plaintiffs had, in fact, abandoned their studies and will soon return to the Solomon Islands. DEPENDENCY – whether "wholly or partly dependent on the deceased" – s 57(1)(e)(i) – principles at [76]-[81] – notion of dependency suggests that the person meeting your needs does not expect repayment – deceased provided funds as loans – support provided went beyond the plaintiffs' needs to create an opportunity to complete further education, gain employment and permanent residence in Australia – whether "member of the household" – s 57(1)(e)(ii) – principles at [86]. CLOSE PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP – s 57(1)(f) – principles at [102]-[108] – whether assistance provided "for fee or reward" – not living together due to bonds of family or friendship – that was not why plaintiffs provided domestic support and personal care. FACTORS WARRANTING – s 59(1)(b) – principles at [115]-[117] – plaintiffs received deceased's charitable generosity – deceased made plain that his assistance ceased on his death – no factors to convert the plaintiffs from potential objects of testamentary recognition to objects in fact. ADEQUACY OF PROVISION – s 60(2) – principles at [126]-[128] –– gift sufficient to cover course fees and assist plaintiffs to relocate – deceased's adult children yet to acquire their first homes in Sydney –plaintiffs have a house and likely to complete studies and gain employment in the Solomon Islands – no further provision warranted. Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW) ss 3(4)(a), 57(1)(e), 57(1)(f), 59(1)(a) and 60(1),(2) Cases Cited: Ball v Newey (1988) 13 NSWLR 489 Barns v Barns (2003) 214 CLR 169 Bezjak v Wyatt [2018] NSWSC 199 Calokernos (Executor of Estate of Sclavos) v Yesilhat [2017] NSWSC 666 Chan v Chan [2016] NSWCA 222 Chapple v Wilcox (2014) 87 NSWLR 646 Chisak v Presot [2022] NSWCA 100 Churton v Christian (1988) 13 NSWLR 241 Doshen v Pedisich [2013] NSWSC 1507 Evans v Levy [2011] NSWCA 125 Friend v Brien [2014] NSWSC 613 Fung v Yee [2007] NSWCA 115 Grey v Harrison [1997] 2 VR 359 Hayes v Marquis [2008] NSWCA 10 Karpin v Gough [2022] NSWSC 471 Kauri Timber Co (Tas) Pty Ltd v Reeman (1973) 128 CLR 177 Kingsland v McIndoe [1989] VR 273 Lodin v Lodin [2017] NSWCA 327 Megerditchian v Khatchadourian [2020] NSWCA 229 Middleton v Kiama District Hospital [1970] 3 NSWR 136 Olsen v Olsen (2019) 101 NSWLR 225 Page v Hull-Moody [2020] NSWSC 411 Piras v Egan [2006] NSW 328 Re Filomena Rodi, Deceased [2016] NSWSC 1696 Re Fulop deceased (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 Re Harris [1936] 5 SASR 497 Russell v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2013] NSWSC 370 Sadiq v NSW Trustee & Guardian [2015] NSWSC 716 Saravinovski v Saravinovska [2017] NSWCA 85 Sgro v Thompson [2017] NSWCA 326 Skarica v Toska [2014] NSWSC 34 Slack v Rogan (2013) 85 NSWLR 253 Smith v Moore [2020] NSWSC 1446 Spata v Tumino [2018] NSWCA 17 Starr v Miller [2021] NSWSC 426 Tobin v Ezekiel (2012) 83 NSWLR 757 Verzar v Verzar [2012] NSWSC 1380 Vigolo v Bostin: (2005) 221 CLR 191 Weisbord v Rodny (No 4) [2022] NSWSC 1726 Worladge v Doddridge (1957) 97 CLR 1 Yee v Yee [2017] NSWCA 305 Yesilhat v Calokerinos [2021] NSWCA 110 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sharon Frank (First Plaintiff) Kim Hagie (Second Plaintiff) Catherine Angell (First Defendant) Joanne Loughlin (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Brown (Plaintiffs) Mr RW Tregenza (Defendants) Solicitors: Carroll & O'Dea Lawyers (Plaintiffs) Paul A Brown & Co Solicitors (Defendants) File Number(s): 2022/243630
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate