NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bao v Li (No 3) [2024] NSWSC 162 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 23 February 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Real Property List Before: Peden J Decision: See [38] Catchwords: COSTS — Application for a special costs order — Whether indemnity costs ought be payable — Whether gross sum costs order necessary to achieve finality between the parties in the course of protracted litigation Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Bao v Li [2022] NSWSC 1335 Colgate Palmolive Pty Ltd (No. 5) (2021) 151 ACSR 26 Colquhoun v District Court of New South Wales (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 54 Kalloghlian v Mitry Lawyers Pty Ltd (No 3) [2022] NSWSC 1201 Li v Tao [2023] NSWCA 310 Riva NSW Pty Ltd v Mark A Fraser and Christopher P Clancy trading as Fraser Clancy Lawyers (No 4) [2018] NSWCA 327 South Western Sydney Local Health District v Gould (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 160 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Costs Parties: Zhong Bao (Plaintiff) Cheryl Shu Yan Li (First Defendant) Zhiyong Tao (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Hill (Second Defendant)
Solicitors: Longton Legal (Plaintiff) Herald Legal (Second Defendant)
Other: C Li (Self Represented) File Number(s): 2020/00182140 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate