NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Griffith City Council v Romeo (No 2) [2024] NSWIRComm 1011 Hearing dates: 4 September 2023 Date of orders: 27 February 2024 Decision date: 27 February 2024 Jurisdiction: Industrial Relations Commission Before: Chief Commissioner Constant, Commissioner Webster and Commissioner Muir Decision: Leave to appeal is refused. Catchwords: EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL LAW - — Industrial Relations Commission — Appeals – Leave to appeal – assessment of harshness - whether utility in granting leave to appeal -no utility – leave refused Legislation Cited: Industrial Relations Act 1996 ss 89, 187, 188, 190A, 191 Road Transport Act 2013 ss 4, 5, 54 Work, Health and Safety Act 2011 ss 19, 32 Cases Cited: Aboud v State of New South Wales (Department of School Education) [1999] NSWIRComm 449; (1999) 92 IR 32 Antonakopoulos v State Bank of New South Wales (1999) 91 IR 385 Australian Coal & Shale Employees' Federation v Commonwealth (1953) 94 CLR 621 Coal & Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2000) 203 CLR 194 Commissioner of Police v Platts [2021] NSWIRComm 1021 Griffith City Council v Romeo [2023] NSWIRComm 1041 Hosemans v Commissioner of Police (No 4) (2005) 150 IR 263 Industrial Relations Secretary v Fraser (No 2) [2015] NSWIRComm 10 King v State Bank of New South Wales (No 2) [2002] NSWIRComm 353; (2002) 126 IR 407 Lovell v Lovell (1950) 81 CLR 513 North v Television Corporation Ltd (1976) 11 ALR 599 Police Association of New South Wales v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2023] NSWIRComm 1095 Re Solicitors (State) Award (No 3) (1997) 72 IR 225 Romeo v Griffith City Council [2023] NSWIRComm 1015 Shakir v Department of Family and Community Services (2017) 270 IR 155; [2017] NSWIRComm 1040 Stone Microsystems (Aust) Pty Ltd v Kwong (1997) 42 NSWLR 160 Qantas Airways Ltd v Transport Workers' Union of Australia (2022) 292 FCR 34 Sydney Ferries Corporation v The Seamen's Union of Australia, NSW Branch on behalf of Levy (2009)186 IR 99 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Griffith City Council (appellant) Rocco Romeo (respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Britt (appellant) A Howell (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate