NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Christopherson v The Star Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCATAD 58 Hearing dates: 21 September 2023, 12 October 2023 Date of orders: 06 March 2024 Decision date: 06 March 2024 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: D Dinnen, Senior Member Decision: 1. Leave is granted under s 96(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 for the Applicant's complaint regarding the incident of 4 September 2022 to proceed with respect to: (a) Direct and/or indirect age discrimination in contravention of ss 49YZA and 40YZN of the Act; (b) Indirect disability discrimination in contravention of ss 49B(1)(b) and 49M(1)(a) of the Act in relation to the requirement to provide secondary identification in the form of a bank card; and (c) Victimisation in contravention of s 50 of the Act with respect to the Applicant's complaint of age discrimination by: (i) Asking the Applicant to leave the premises; (ii) Referring the Applicant to police; and (iii) After 4 September 2022, issuing the Applicant with a WOL letter. 2. Leave is refused under s 96(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 in relation to the remainder of the Applicant's complaint. 3. The matter is listed for case conference on Wednesday, 27 March 2024, at 2.00pm. Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – Discrimination – equal opportunity – provision of services - age discrimination - disability discrimination – direct or indirect – victimisation - leave required for complaint to proceed – principles applying to grant of leave Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Casino Control Act 1992 Casino Control Regulation 2019 Liquor Act 2007 Cases Cited: Abela v State of Victoria [2013] FCA 832 Bonella & Ors v Wollongong City Council [2001] NSWADT 194 Catholic Education Office v Clarke (2004) 138 FCR 121 Chalker v Murrays Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAD 282 Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 143 Jones v Ekermawi [2009] NSWCA 388 Langley v Niland [1981] 2 NSWLR 104 New South Wales v Amery (2006) 230 CLR 174 Nicholls and Nicholls v Director General, Department of Education and Training (No 2) [2009] NSWADTAP 20 Prakash v Bobb Borg Enterprises Pty Ltd [1999] NSWADT 73 Sklavos v Australasian College of Dermatologists [2017] FCAFC 128 Tate v Rafin [2000] FCA 1582 Walker v Victoria [2011] FCA 258 Waters & Ors v Public Transport Corporation (1991) 173 CLR 349 Wiggins v Department of Defence - Navy [2006] FMCA 800; 200 FLR 438 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Liam Christopherson (Applicant) The Star Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Foran (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate