State of New South Wales v O’Hara (Final) [2024] NSWSC 225

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v O'Hara (Final) [2024] NSWSC 225 Hearing dates: 5 March 2024 Date of orders: 8 March 2024 Decision date: 08 March 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Chen J Decision: (1) Order, pursuant to ss 5B and 9(1)(a) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) that the defendant be subject to an extended supervision order ("the extended supervision order") for a period of two years from the date of the order; and (2) Order, pursuant to s 11 of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), the defendant, for the period of the extended supervision order, comply with the conditions set out in schedule A to this judgment. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDERS – extended supervision orders – violent offender – where defendant does not oppose making of ESO – where dispute is limited to the length of the ESO and conditions to be imposed – extended supervision order imposed Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney General for New South Wales v Tillman [2007] NSWCA 119 Cornwall v Attorney General for New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374 Kamm v State of New South Wales (No 4) (2017) 95 NSWLR 179; [2017] NSWCA 189 Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57 State of New South Wales v BG (Preliminary) [2022] NSWSC 1065 State of New South Wales v Chaplin [2019] NSWSC 471 State of New South Wales v Davis (Preliminary) [2021] NSWSC 53 State of New South Wales v Devaney (Final) [2022] NSWSC 60 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWCA 280 State of New South Wales v Golding (Preliminary) [2018] NSWSC 1041 State of New South Wales v Ibrahim (Final) [2021] NSWSC 793 State of New South Wales v Kaiser [2022] NSWCA 86 State of New South Wales v Kamm (Final) [2016] NSWSC 1 State of New South Wales v Shields (Preliminary) [2022] NSWSC State of New South Wales v Simcock (Final) [2016] NSWSC 1805 State of New South Wales v Wilkinson (Preliminary) [2020] NSWSC 1813 Tannous v State of New South Wales (2020) 103 NSWLR 183; [2020] NSWCA 261 Wilde v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (plaintiff) Django O'Hara (defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Aitken (plaintiff) C Akthar (defendant)