NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: 66 Ernest St Developments Pty Limited ATF 66 Ernest St Development Unit Trust v North Sydney Council [2024] NSWLEC 1115 Hearing dates: 8-9 February 2024 Date of orders: 15 March 2024 Decision date: 15 March 2024 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Horton C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) Development consent for development application DA407/2022 seeking consent for demolition of an existing residential flat building and construction of a part three, part four residential flat building, containing nine apartments over a single level of basement parking with associated works and landscaping is refused. (3) All exhibits are returned except for Exhibits A, B, C, K, M and N. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – residential apartment development – residential flat building in R2 Low Density Residential zone – existing use – whether sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravention of height standard Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 1.3, 4.15, 4.65, 4.66, 4.67, 8.7 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 39 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, Pt 7, ss 38, 163, 164 North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013, cll 4.3, 4.6 State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 – Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development Cases Cited: Fodor Investments v Hornsby Shire Council (2005) 141 LGERA 14; [2005] NSWLEC 71 P D Mayoh Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council No 10219 of 1997 [1997] NSWLEC 149 Project Venture Developments v Pittwater Council (2005) 141 LGERA 80; (2005) NSWLEC 191 Saffioti v Kiama Municipal Council [2019] NSWLEC 57 Wehbe v Pittwater Council (2007) 156 LGERA 446; [2007] NSWLEC 827 Texts Cited: North Sydney Development Control Plan 2013 Category: Principal judgment Parties: 66 Ernest St Developments Pty Limited ATF 66 Ernest St Development Unit Trust (Applicant) North Sydney Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Staunton (Applicant) A Seton (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate