NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Matthews [2023] NSWDC 611 Hearing dates: 11 December 2023 Date of orders: 11 December 2023 Decision date: 11 December 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Aggregate sentence of 12 years imprisonment with a non‑parole period of 9 years Catchwords: CRIME — Apprehended violence orders — Contravene apprehended violence order CRIME — Sexual offences — Aggravated sexual intercourse without consent — Sexual intercourse without consent CRIME — Public justice offences — Do an act with intent to pervert course of justice CRIME — Violent offences — Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm — Choking SENTENCING — Penalties — Imprisonment SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Assessing the seriousness of each offence — No need for abstract descriptors — Specific deterrence — General deterrence — Totality — Objective seriousness — Aggregation SENTENCING — Sentencing procedure — Instinctive synthesis SENTENCING — Subjective considerations on sentence — No finding of special circumstances given length of sentence — Controversial aspects of psychologists report unable to be proved SENTENCING — Aggravating factors — Domestic violence offences — In the family home — Presence of child — Pregnant complainant — Subject to bail – Subject to ADVO — Persistent offending SENTENCING — Mitigating factors — Prosocial support — Family history SENTENCING — Sentencing procedure — Use of character references — Some assertions contradicted by other evidence — Victim impact Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007(NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ahmu v R; DPP v Ahmu [2014] NSWCCA 312 Browning v R [2015] NSWCCA 147 Cherry v R [2017] NSWCCA 150 DH v R [2022] NSWCCA 200 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Beattie [2017] NSWCCA 301 Harrigan v R [2005] NSWCCA 449 Kochai v R [2023] NSWCCA 116 Marinellis v R [2006] NSWCCA 307 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 MRM v R [2015] NSWCCA 195 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120; Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38 The Queen v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; (1999) 199 CLR 270 Owen v R [2022] NSWCCA 214 R v AJP [2004] NSWCCA 434 R v Burton [2008] NSWCCA 128 R v Cahyadi [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 R v Dunn [2004] NSWCCA 346 R v Giang [2001] NSWCCA 276 R v Harris [2007] NSWCCA 130; 171 A Crim R 267 R v Herring (1956) 73 WN (NSW) 203 R v Pangallo (1991) 56 A Crim R 441 R v Taouk (1992) 65 A Crim R 387 R v Wheeler [2000] NSWCCA 34 R v Windle [2012] NSWCCA 222 R v XX (2009) 195 A Crim R 38 Ryan v The Queen [2001] HCA 21; (2001) 206 CLR 267 Taylor v R [2007] NSWCCA 99 The Queen v Kilic [2016] HCA 48; (2016) 259 CLR 256 Van Ryn v R [2016] NSWCCA 1 Doe v Regina [2013] NSWCCA 248; (2013) 187 A Crim R 328 Category: Sentence Parties: David Richard Matthews (the offender) Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) Representation: Counsel: S Fraser (for the offender) N Keay (for the Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate