NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gazal v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No. 2) [2024] NSWSC 293 Hearing dates: Hearing on the papers in chambers only Date of orders: 22 March 2024 Decision date: 22 March 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: A gross sum of $48,459.22 is fixed instead of assessed costs in respect of the defendant's costs of these proceedings pursuant to Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c). Catchwords: COSTS – specified gross sum costs order instead of assessed costs – Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c) – defendant, the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, successfully opposes the plaintiff's appeal against a Departure Prohibition Order issued under the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), s 14S – plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings – plaintiff has few assets in his own name – plaintiff advanced evidence of doubtful provenance in support of his claim – whether the conduct of a costs assessment would be aggravating or oppressive to the defendant in the circumstances – what is the appropriate specified gross sum to be fixed instead of assessed costs – whether a discount should be applied from the costs claimed by the defendant – consideration of the effect of proceedings being brought in vacation reducing the cost efficiencies that might otherwise have been employed by the legal representatives of the defendant. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 56(1), 57(1)(d), 60, 98(4)(c) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), s 14S Cases Cited: Australasian Performing Rights Assoc Ltd v Marlin [1999] FCA 1006 Bechara (t/as Bechara and Company) v Bates [2016] NSWCA 294 Gazal v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2024] NSWSC 1 Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc [2000] FCA 628 Hamod v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 Norfeld v Jones (No. 2) [2014] NSWSC 199 Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd (No.3) [2015] NSWCA 121 WLD Practice Holdings Pty Ltd v Stockham [2020] NSWSC 1354 Category: Costs Parties: Plaintiff: Nahi Nasri Gazal Defendant: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: M. Bateman Defendant: S. Scott
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate