NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Trieu v ROOK CMIT Pty Ltd (Costs) [2024] NSWSC 304 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 26 March 2024 Decision date: 26 March 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt AJ Decision: Mr Trieu bear the defendants' costs of the motions on an indemnity basis. Catchwords: COSTS – indemnity costs – where plaintiff was self-represented at hearing of notices of motion – whether relevant misconduct in the proceedings warranting indemnity costs order established –unreasonableness of plaintiff's application for summary judgment and resistance of defendants' application for leave to amend defence and file a cross claim contrary to obligations under the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) warrants indemnity costs order –– costs ordered on indemnity basis Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56-58, 98 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), Pt 42 Cases Cited: Cabport Pty Ltd v Marinchek (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 131 Colgate Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 Northern Territory v Sangare (2019) 265 CLR 164; [2019] HCA 25 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Trieu v ROOK CMIT Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 122 Category: Costs Parties: Phuoc Trieu (Plaintiff) ROOK CMIT Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Robert Rook (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Reuben (Plaintiff) P Tiliakos (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate