NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Racing New South Wales v Racing Victoria Ltd (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 312 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 26 March 2024 Decision date: 26 March 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Rees J Decision: Rulings on privilege claims. Catchwords: CLIENT LEGAL PRIVILEGE – s 118, Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – onus – means of proof – dominant purpose – ruling on 'sample' documents – efficacy questioned – privilege over communications with in-house lawyers – principles at [13]-[14] – privilege over communications between non-lawyers – principles at [15]. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 118 Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), s 118 Cases Cited: 789Ten v Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd (2005) 215 ALR 131 Andrianakis v Uber Technologies Inc; Taxi Apps Pty Ltd v Uber Technologies Inc [2022] VSC 196 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) v NSW Ports Operations Hold Co Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1232 AWB Ltd v Cole (No 5) (2006) 155 FCR 30 Balabel v Air India [1988] 1 Ch 317 Commissioner of Australia Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501 DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Intertan Inc (2003) 135 FCR 151 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Spotless Services Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 404 Giurina v Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) [2020] VSC 1 Hastie Group Ltd (in liq) v Moore (2016) 339 ALR 635 IOOF Holdings v Maurice Blackburn Pty Ltd [2016] VSC 311 Komlotex Pty Ltd v AMP Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1525 Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2004) 136 FCR 357 Priest v New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 1281 Racing New South Wales v Racing Victoria Ltd [2024] NSWSC 147 Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA v Akers [2014] EWCA Civ 136 Sydney Airports Corp Ltd v Singapore Airlines Ltd [2005] NSWCA 47 Texts Cited: Stephen Odgers, Uniform Evidence Law (18th ed, 2022, Thomson Reuters) Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Racing New South Wales (First Plaintiff/Applicant) Russel Balding (Second Plaintiff/Applicant) Racing Victoria Ltd (First Defendant/Respondent) Greg Nichols (Second Defendant/Respondent) Brian Kruger (Fourth Defendant/Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: O Jones (Plaintiffs) TB Maxwell (Defendants) Solicitors: Yeldham Price O'Brien Luck (Plaintiffs) Ashurst (Defendants) File Number(s): 2022/386737
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate