NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kapila v R [2024] NSWCCA 48 Hearing dates: 29 November 2023 Date of orders: 05 April 2024 Decision date: 05 April 2024 Before: Harrison CJ at CL at [1] Button J at [2] Weinstein J at [3] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – whether the sentencing judge erred by double counting a Form 1 offence when assessing the objective seriousness of a count to which it did not attach – facts and circumstances of a Form 1 offence may be considered to provide context – no demonstrable error – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 93T, 192E(1)(b), 193C(1), 344A(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 25D(2), 32(1), 33(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1)(c) Cases Cited: Ahmad v R [2022] NSWCCA 144 Andrew Smith v R [2013] NSWCCA 209 Dang v R [2014] NSWCCA 47 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v TH [2023] NSWCCA 81 Lonsdale v R [2020] NSWCCA 267 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Ragg v R [2022] NSWCCA 150 RL v R [2018] NSWCCA 274 RO v R [2019] NSWCCA 183 Singh v R [2021] NSWCCA 96 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nitin Kapila (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Trevallion (Applicant) V Garrity (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate