NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Giddings v Sharp [2024] NSWSC 344 Hearing dates: 11 March 2024; 26 March 2024 Decision date: 26 March 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Real Property List Before: Peden J Decision: At [42] Catchwords: EQUITY — Equitable remedies — Specific performance — Land — Where defendant unlikely to comply with Court orders — Whether consequential orders empowering Registrar in Equity to execute necessary documentation ought to be made COSTS — Party/Party — Where plaintiff seeking gross sum costs order — Whether sufficient evidence to make gross sum costs order — Whether proposed discount to gross sum amount sufficient Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 94, 98 Conveyancing Rules 2001 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ahern v Aon Risk Services Australia Limited (No 2) [2022] NSWCA 39 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Dariusz Adam Gaszewski [2006] NSWSC 77 Hamod v New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Savage v Norton [1908] 1 Ch 290 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Phillip James Giddings (First Plaintiff in Proceeding 2022/357444) Julie Ruth Giddings (Second Plaintiff in Proceeding 2022/357444) Selena Elisabeth Irene Riley (Plaintiff in Proceeding 2022/357447) Christopher Sharp (Defendant in both proceedings) Representation: Counsel: L Chan (Plaintiffs)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate