NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mohareb v Manly Local Court [2024] NSWSC 345 Hearing dates: 18 March 2024 Decision date: 05 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: 1. Amended summons of applicant dismissed 2. Contested portion of notice of motion of applicant dismissed 3. Various costs orders made. Catchwords: APPEALS – appeal from Local Court to Supreme Court – where pending criminal charges against applicant in the Local Court – subpoenas sought for documents from NSW police and local hospital – where refusal by Local Court Registrar to issue subpoenas – where application for review dismissed by Magistrate – prerogative relief sought – in the alternative, leave to appeal refusal by Magistrate in the Local Court – whether error of law on the face of the record – whether applicant denied procedural fairness – whether findings by Magistrate incapable of being supported – whether decision affected by actual or apprehended bias – arguments by applicant rejected – various costs orders made APPEALS – review of various interlocutory decisions of Registrar – certain costs orders impugned – submission that informant in criminal proceedings in Local Court should not be a party in application for prerogative relief and leave to appeal in Supreme Court ill-conceived – notice of motion substantively dismissed – various costs orders made Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Part 5 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) s 13 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 103 Cases Cited: Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 QYFM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] HCA 15 Stradford (a pseudonym) v Judge Vasta [2023] FCA 1020 The King v Anna Rowan – A Pseudonym [2024] HCA 9 Wentworth v Rogers (No 5) (1986) 6 NSWLR 534 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nader Mohareb (Applicant) Manly Local Court (First Respondent) Constable Aden Murphy (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented (Applicant) R Sherrington (First Respondent) N Regener (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate