NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hadid v State of New South Wales [2024] NSWCA 73 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 11 April 2024 Decision date: 11 April 2024 Before: Kirk JA; Stern JA. Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is refused. 2. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs of the application. Catchwords: APPEALS – leave to appeal – whether to grant leave – circumstances of case did not raise matters of public importance – monetary amount small – leave refused Legislation Cited: District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 127(2)(c) Cases Cited: Blacktown City Council v Hocking [2008] NSWCA 144 Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Ltd (t/as Bennetts Green Bowl) [1995] NSWCA 69 Riechelmann v McCabe [2024] NSWCA 37 Toth v State of New South Wales [2022] NSWCA 185 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jawad Hadid (Applicant) State of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Sheller SC w E Hall (Applicant) A Williams (Respondent)
Solicitors: Macquarie Law Group (Applicant) Norton Rose Fulbright (Respondent) File Number(s): 2023/343880 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Civil Citation: [2023] NSWDC 446 Date of Decision: 24 October 2023 Before: Weber DCJ File Number(s): 2022/74026
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate