NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Entertainment One Films Australia Pty Ltd v Hopscotch Pictures Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 365 Hearing dates: 13 November 2023 and 28 March 2024 Decision date: 10 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Ball J Decision: (1) The plaintiffs are to pay the defendants' costs for the period 17 February 2023 to date in connection with: (a) The plaintiffs' proposed amendments to its commercial list statement; (b) The plaintiffs' discovery motion filed on 26 April 2024; (c) The defendants' strike out motion filed on 2 May 2024; (d) The plaintiffs' motion seeking a separate question filed on 2 November 2023, as a gross sum in the amount of $110,000, payable forthwith; (2) The plaintiffs are to pay the defendants' costs incurred prior to 17 February 2023 thrown away by reason of the amendment, as agreed or assessed; (3) The costs order in order (1) above involves the discharge of the following costs orders made in favour of the defendants: (a) Order 4 made on 18 May 2023 (costs of the strike out motion); (b) The costs order made on 13 November 2023 (in connection with the costs of the hearing on 22 September 2023 and 13 November 2023). Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Pleadings — Amendment — Leave granted to file proposed amended pleadings exclusive of specific paras due to inadequate particularisation CIVIL PROCEDURE — Discovery — General discovery — Where plaintiff is unable to properly particularise claim without discovery COSTS — Party/Party — Costs orders in interlocutory proceedings – Gross sum costs order — Unnecessarily and unreasonably causing legal expenses to be incurred — Where plaintiffs have persisted in seeking to advance a cause which has limited factual foundation COSTS — Party/Party — Costs orders in interlocutory proceedings — Whether classification as interlocutory or final costs orders affects question of gross sum costs order Legislation Cited: Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Cases Cited: Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No 6) [2014] NSWSC 1009 Ireland v Retallack (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 1096 Kimberly College Ltd v Thomson [2019] QSC 227 Newcrest Mining Ltd v WA NorthWest Pty Ltd [2022] WASC 315 Proctor v Kalivis [2009] FCA 795 Raffy Nominees Pty Ltd v nib Holdings Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 1294 WA Pines Pty Ltd v Bannerman (1980) 30 ALR 559 Category: Costs Parties: Entertainment One Films Australia Pty Ltd ACN 149 606 726 (First Plaintiff | Cross Defendant) eOne Features (Developments) Limited 09972486 UK company (Second Plaintiff) Hopscotch Features Pty Ltd ACN 135 543 047 (First Defendant) Troy Andrew Lum (Second Defendant | Cross Claimant) Representation: Counsel: C Withers SC with P Abdiel (Plaintiffs | Cross Defendant) DA Hughes (Defendants | Cross Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate