NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Whitmore [2024] NSWDC 115 Hearing dates: 12 April 2024 Date of orders: 12 April 2024 Decision date: 12 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraphs [78]-[79] Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – assault occasioning actual bodily harm – fact finding after jury acquittal on a more serious offence – dispute over extent of victim's injuries and the offender's responsibility for them – consideration of offender's motive – whether offender remorseful – relevance that offending could have been dealt with summarily – whether hardship Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 59(1), 112(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 3A, 5(1), 21A(2) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) sch 1 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571 DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1 R v Muldrock (2011) 244 CLR 120 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Sentence Parties: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) Mr Nathan Charles Luke Whitmore Representation: Counsel: Mr A O'Connor (ODPP) Mr B Robinson for the offender
Solicitors: ODPP Legal Aid NSW File Number(s): 2023/00135537 Publication restriction: Nil
EX TEMPORE SENTENCING REMARKS
Introduction 1. Mr Nathan Whitmore (the 'offender') is before the Court for sentencing for the offence that on 1 April 2023, at Wyong, he assaulted Mr Andrew Knighton (the 'victim') thereby occasioning actual bodily harm, contrary to s 59(1) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). 2. The maximum penalty for that offence is 5 years' imprisonment. There is no standard non-parole period for this offence. 3. At a trial, which commenced on 29 June 2024, the offender pleaded not guilty to the offence (count 1 on the indictment) of aggravated breaking and entering premises and committing a serious indictable offence (contrary to s 112(2) of the Crimes Act). A jury later acquitted him of that charge. 4. At that trial, the offender pleaded guilty to the index offence (count 2 on the indictment) on 29 January 2024. 5. It is common ground that he is entitled to a 25% discount on the guilty plea since the offender had previously offered that plea to the Crown in a case conference in the Local Court but the Crown had rejected that offer.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate