NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v RT (No 1) [2024] NSWDC 116 Hearing dates: 4, 5, 11 and 15 April 2024 Date of orders: 15 April 2024 Decision date: 15 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Sutherland SC DCJ Decision: [85] – [97] Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Sexual assault communications privilege — Applications for leave CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Subpoena — Objection to production of material — Sexual assault communications privilege — Applications for leave under section 299D of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Sexual offence proceedings — Admissibility of evidence related to sexual experience — Applications for leave to cross-examine under section 294CB(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) ss 294CB, 298, 299B, 299D Cases Cited: Jackmain (a pseudonym) v R (2020) 102 NSWLR 847; [2020] NSWCCA 150 KS v Veitch (No 2) (2012) 84 NSWLR 172; [2012] NSWCCA 266 NAR v PPC1 [2013] NSWCCA 25; (2013) 224 A Crim R 535 Rohan v R [2018] NSWCCA 89 M v R (1993) 67 A Crim R 549 R v Bernthaler NSWCCA (60394/1993; Unreported 17 December 1993) R v Burton [2013] NSWCCA 335; (2013) 237 A Crim R 238 R v White (1989) 18 NSWLR 332 Valentine v R [2023] NSWCCA 43 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Crown) RT (Accused) Principal Protected Confider Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate