NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bega Valley Shire Council v Kenpass Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 399 Hearing dates: 3 April 2024; further written submissions 8 April 2024 Date of orders: 17 April 2024 Decision date: 17 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Nixon J Decision: (1) The Summons filed 11 March 2024 be dismissed. (2) The Plaintiff pay the Defendant's costs, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – whether adjudication determination under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 should be quashed – adjudicator determined that the payment schedule did not contain valid reasons for withholding payment and that the adjudication response advanced new reasons which the adjudicator was not permitted to consider – whether the adjudicator failed to comply with mandatory requirements of Act – whether there was a substantial denial of procedural fairness – jurisdictional error not established Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) ss 14, 20, 22 Cases Cited: Ceerose Pty Ltd v A-Civil Aust Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 215 Coordinated Construction Co Pty Ltd v JM Hargreaves (NSW) Pty Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 385; [2005] NSWCA 228 CPB Contractors Pty Ltd v Heyday5 Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1625 Demex Pty Ltd v McNab Building Services Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 261 Icon Co (NSW) Pty Ltd v Australia Avenue Developments Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 339 John Holland Pty Ltd v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (RTA) [2007] NSWCA 19 Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd v Luikens [2003] NSWSC 1140 Perform (NSW) Pty Ltd v MEV-AUS Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 157 Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd (2018) 264 CLR 1; [2018] HCA 4 Style Timber Floor Pty Ltd v Krivosudsky [2019] NSWCA 171 Witron Australia Pty Ltd v Turnkey Innovative Engineering Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 305 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bega Valley Shire Council (Plaintiff) Kenpass Pty Ltd (First Defendant) John Tuhtan (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Weinberger (Plaintiff) M Christie SC (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate