NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Council of the NSW Bar Association v Rollinson [2024] NSWCA 84 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 19 April 2024 Decision date: 19 April 2024 Before: Leeming JA, Stern JA, Griffiths AJA Decision: (1) Declare that Michael Kelvyn Rollinson is not a fit and proper person to remain on the roll of Australian lawyers maintained by the Supreme Court under s 22 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW). (2) Order that the name of Michael Kelvyn Rollinson be removed from that roll. (3) There is no order as to costs. Catchwords: OCCUPATIONS – Legal practitioners – Barristers – Removal from roll of barristers – where barrister repeatedly and wilfully disobeyed injunctions preventing him from legal practice and advertising or presenting that he was able to engage in legal practice – where he pleaded guilty and was found to have committed 16 counts of contempt for continuing to practise – where he committed 12 contraventions of suspended imprisonment conditions Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), ss 22, 23, 264, 303(1) Cases Cited: APLA Ltd v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW) (2005) 224 CLR 322; [2005] HCA 44 Council of Law Society NSW v Jafari [2020] NSWCA 53 Council of the Law Society of NSW v Clarke [2022] NSWCA 57 Council of the Law Society of NSW v Green [2022] NSWCA 257 Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Costigan [2013] NSWCA 407 Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Perry [2007] NSWCA 111 Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Siggins [2021] NSWCA 40 Council of the NSW Bar Association v Rollinson [2022] NSWSC 407 Council of the NSW Bar Association v Rollinson (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 1390 Garde-Wilson v Legal Services Board (2007) 27 VAR 125; [2007] VSC 225 Legal Practitioners Conduct Board v Trueman [2003] SASC 58 New South Wales Bar Association v Cummins (2001) 52 NSWLR 279; [2001] NSWCA 284 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v McCaffery [2004] NSWCA 470 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Thomson [2018] NSWCA 230 Re B (a Solicitor) [1986] VR 695 RJA Cornall (in his capacity of Secretary of the Law Institute of Victoria) v JD Little (Supreme Court (Vic), Tadgell J, 11 June 1991, unrep) Ziems v Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of NSW (1957) 97 CLR 279; [1957] HCA 46 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Council of the New South Wales Bar Association (Applicant) Michael Kelvyn Rollinson (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Richardson SC/D Habashy (Applicant) M Dennis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate