NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Goldmate Property Luddenham No. 1 Pty Ltd v Transport for NSW [2024] NSWLEC 39 Hearing dates: 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15 and 16 May 2023; written submissions filed 12, 18 and 19 December 2023; further written submissions filed 20, 27 February 2024 and 5 March 2024 Date of orders: 19 April 2024 Decision date: 19 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Duggan J Decision: See paragraphs [140]-[141] Catchwords: COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – Objection to compensation for compulsory acquisition pursuant to s 66 of Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 – determination of public purpose within s 56(1)(a) – relevant purpose broadly construed to include the Western Sydney Infrastructure Plan, the Western Sydney Airport and attendant economic opportunities – rezoning of land integral to public purpose – statutory disregard pursuant to s 56(1)(a) – determination of market value of land – compensation for injurious affection – claim for disturbance – costs Legislation Cited: Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) Roads Act 1993 (NSW) Cases Cited: AMP Capital Investors Ltd and Another v Transport Infrastructure Development Corporation (2008) 163 LGERA 245 Barkat v Roads and Maritime Services [2019] NSWCA 240 Coffs Harbour City Council v Noubia Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCA 19 Croghan v Blacktown City Council (2019) 237 LGERA 227 Fraietta v Roads and Maritime Services [2017] NSWLEC 11 Eureka Operations Pty Ltd v Transport for New South Wales [2021] NSWLEC 41 Housing Commission (NSW) v San Sebastian Pty Ltd (1978) 140 CLR 196 Marroun v Roads and Traffic Authority [2012] NSWLEC 199 Roads and Traffic Authority v Perry (2001) 52 NSWLR 222 Sydney Metro v G & J Drivas Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCA 5 Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority (2008) 233 CLR 259 Texts Cited: Macquarie Dictionary, 3rd ed (1997) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Goldmate Property Luddenham No 1 Pty Ltd (Applicant) Transport for NSW (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Hale SC with N Eastman (Applicant) N Hutley SC with M Astill and E Dunlop (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate