NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Alcorp Builders Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 1208 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference 4 April 2024 Date of orders: 23 April 2024 Decision date: 23 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: The Court orders: (1) Pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Applicant is to pay those costs of the Respondent that have been thrown away as a result of the amendment to the development application in the agreed final sum of $20,000.00 to be paid within 28 days of these orders. (2) The appeal is upheld. (3) Development application number DA22/1154, as amended, for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a residential flat building on land identified as Lot 17 in Deposited Plan 14633 and Lot 18 in Deposited Plan 14633 and known as 32-34 Waratah Road, Engadine NSW 2233, is determined by the grant of development consent subject to the conditions included at Annexure A. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – demolition and construction of a residential flat building – amended plans and additional information – agreement between the parties – orders made Legislation Cited: Architects Act 2003 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 8.7 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, ss 29, 38 State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021, Pt 2.2, s 2.10 State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021, Ch 4, ss 145, 147 State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6 State Environmental Planning Policy (Transport and Infrastructure) 2021, s 2.48 Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015, cll 4.3, 4.4, 6.2, 6.4 Texts Cited: Apartment Design Guide 2015 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alcorp Builders Pty Ltd (Applicant) Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Griffiths (Solicitor) (Applicant) P Brown (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate