NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: KMA Developments No. 5 Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 1212 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference held on 16 April 2024 Date of orders: 23 April 2024 Decision date: 23 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Bish C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) Pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the applicant is to pay those costs of the respondent that have been thrown away as a result of the amendment of the development application, as agreed or assessed. (2) The appeal is upheld. (3) Development Application DA293/2023/ZD seeking Community title subdivision into 12 lots and one Community Property lot, on Lot 6003 Deposited Plan (DP) 1215176 and Lot 3 DP 1159841, also known as 17-25 Samantha Riley Drive, North Kellyville is determined by the grant of consent, and subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – Community title subdivision – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 4.47, 8.15, 8.7 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 Rural Fires Act 1997, s 100B Water Management Act 2000, s 91 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, ss 23, 38 State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021, Ch 9, s 9.2 State Environmental Planning Policy (Precincts - Central River City) 2021, Appendix 5, ss 2.3, 6.2, 6.3, 6.5 State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6 Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 – Hawkesbury-Nepean River, s 2 Texts Cited: The Hills Shire Council Community Participation Plan North Kellyville Precinct Development Control Plan 2018 Category: Principal judgment Parties: KMA Developments No. 5 Pty Ltd (Applicant) The Hills Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Farland (Applicant) S Kondilios (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate