NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Barrett [2024] NSWSC 433 Hearing dates: 31 January 2024 (last written submission 29 February 2024) Date of orders: 24 April 2024 Decision date: 24 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: Application under the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW) for a costs certificate is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Costs — Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW) – blackmail – Plutus Payroll tax fraud – hung jury – legal aid refused for retrial – stay refused – discontinuation of proceedings by CDPP – credibility of witness – history as investigative journalist – whether if prosecution had all relevant facts it would have been reasonable to institute proceedings – application refused Legislation Cited: Commonwealth Constitution, ss 75(iii), 77(iii) Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW), ss 2, 3, 3A, 4 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 249K Criminal Code 1995 (Cth), s 400.3(1) Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1986 (NSW), s 7(2)(b) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 184 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) Cases Cited: Chahal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2008] NSWCA 152; (2008) A Crim R 580 DAO v R (No 3) [2016] NSWCCA 282 Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292; [1992] HCA 57 Higgins v R (No 2) [2022] NSWCCA 82 Honeysett v DPP [2023] NSWCCA 215 Macleod v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2002) 211 CLR 287; [2002] HCA 37 Mordaunt v Director of Public Prosecutions & Anor [2007] NSWCA 121; (2007) 171 A Crim R 510 Nadilo v Director of Public Prosecutions (1995) 35 NSWLR 738 R v Barrett (No 6) [2021] NSWSC 1342 R v Barrett (No 7) [2021] NSWSC 1349 R v Hausman; Hausman v R; R v Rostankovski; Rostankovski v R [2022] NSWCCA 24 R v John Fejsa (1995) 82 A Crim R 253 R v Jonathon Harold Manley (2000) 49 NSWLR 203; [2000] NSWCCA 196 R v Pavy (1997) 98 A Crim R 396 Rodden v R (2003) 112 NSWLR 162; [2023] NSWCCA 202 Solomons v District Court of NSW (2000) 211 CLR 119; [2002] HCA 47 Category: Costs Parties: Rex (Crown) Steven John Barrett (Applicant) Representation: Counsel: T McDonald SC (Crown) Dr G D Woods KC (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate