State of New South Wales v Stone (Final) [2024] NSWSC 435

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Stone (Final) [2024] NSWSC 435 Hearing dates: 8 April 2024 Date of orders: 12 April 2024 Decision date: 22 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wright J Decision: (1) Pursuant to ss 5B and 9(1)(a) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), the defendant is subject to an extended supervision order ('the extended supervision order') for a period of three years from the date of the order. (2) Pursuant to s 11 of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act, the defendant is directed, for the period of the extended supervision order, to comply with conditions in the terms set out in the schedule to these orders. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDERS – supervision and other orders under the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) – application for extended supervision order (ESO) – ESO not opposed – appropriate duration of ESO – conditions to be imposed as part of the ESO – no point of principle Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), ss 3, 5B, 5H, 5I, 6, 6(3)(b), 7, 7(4), 9(1)(a), 9(2)-(3), 9(3)(d1), 10A, 10C(1), 11, 11(1)-(2), 12, 13 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Supreme Court Practice Note SC CL 12, cl 26(i) Cases Cited: Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57 R v Stone [2004] NSWSC 224; 144 A Crim R 568 State of New South Wales v BP (No. 2) [2019] NSWSC 806 State of New South Wales v Osman [2021] NSWSC 124 State of New South Wales v Wilkinson (Preliminary) [2020] NSWSC 1813 Wilde v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 28; (2015) 249 A Crim R 65 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Peter Stone (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Aitken (Plaintiff) B Kennedy with J Cooper (Defendant)