NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Nehme; R v Price; R v Rahim; R v Rizk; R v Taufahema [2023] NSWSC 1656 Hearing dates: 24 October 2023 Date of orders: 24 October 2023 Decision date: 24 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McNaughton J Decision: In relation to the accused Rahim, the Court makes the following order: (1) The accused Rahim's previous plea of guilty to the s 97 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) offence is not admissible Catchwords: CRIME – murder – joint criminal enterprise – where accused is seeking a ruling to exclude evidence of a previous plea of guilty – where previous plea of guilty entered when the indictment was in a different form – risk of unfairness if evidence of the plea of guilty adduced at this trial – danger of unfair prejudice outweighs the probative value – evidence not admissible Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 97, 98 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 90, 137 Cases Cited: Mitchell v The King [2023] HCA 5 R v Nehme, Price, Rahim, Taufahema and Rizk [2023] NSWSC 202 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Crown) Joseph Nehme (Accused) Lisa Anne Price (Accused) Bilal Rahim (Accused) Sherene Rizk (Accused) Viliami Bui Taufahema (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K Ratcliffe (Crown) D Dalton SC / T Weller-Wong (Joseph Nehme) T Quilter (Lisa Anne Price) B Neild SC (Bilal Rahim) N Carroll (Sherene Rizk) A Evers (Viliami Bui Taufahema)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate