NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Nehme; R v Price; R v Rahim; R v Rizk; R v Taufahema (No 4) [2024] NSWSC 451 Hearing dates: 31 October 2023 Date of orders: 31 October 2023 Decision date: 06 May 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McNaughton J Decision: In relation to the accused Nehme, the Court makes the following order: (1) The application for a separate trial is granted Catchwords: CRIME – murder – practice and procedure – application for a separate trial – where an accused unlawfully accessed confidential instructions of a co-accused – where counsel had to withdraw pursuant to r 101(a) of the Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015 (NSW) – where unknown degree of dissemination of stolen material – indeterminate element of incurable prejudice unless a separate trial is ordered Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015 (NSW), r 101(a) Cases Cited: Caleo v R [2021] NSWCCA 179; (2021) 290 A Crim R 352 Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292; [1992] HCA 57 Jago v District Court of New South Wales (1989) 168 CLR 23; [1989] HCA 46 Lee v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 455; [2014] HCA 20 McNamara v The King [2023] HCA 36 Mitchell v The King [2023] HCA 5 Nehme v R [2022] NSWCCA 49 R v Houda [2022] NSWCCA 179 R v Nehme & Ors (No 1) [2022] NSWSC 138 R v Nehme & Ors (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 171 R v Nehme & Ors (No 3) [2022] NSWSC 205 R v Nehme & Ors (No 4) [2022] NSWSC 202 R v Nehme & Ors (No 5) [2022] NSWSC 254 R v Nehme & Ors (No 6) [2022] NSWSC 250 R v Nehme & Ors (No 7) [2022] NSWSC 1723 R v Nehme, Price, Rahim, Taufahema and Rizk [2023] NSWSC 202 R v Nehme, Price, Rahim, Taufahema and Rizk (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 843 R v Nehme, Price, Rahim, Taufahema and Rizk (No 3) [2023] NSWSC 844 R v Nehme, Price, Rahim, Taufahema and Rizk (No 4) [2023] NSWSC 932 R v Nehme, Price, Rahim, Taufahema and Rizk (No 5) [2023] NSWSC 933 R v Nehme, Price, Rahmin, Taufahema and Rizk (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 843 Strickland (a pseudonym) v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (2018) 266 CLR 325; [2018] HCA 53 Webb v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 41; [1994] HCA 30 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Crown) Joseph Nehme (Accused) Lisa Anne Price (Accused) Bilal Rahim (Accused) Sherene Rizk (Accused) Viliami Bui Taufahema (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K Ratcliffe (Crown) D Dalton SC / T Weller-Wong (Joseph Nehme) T Quilter (Lisa Anne Price) N Carroll (Sherene Rizk) A Evers (Viliami Bui Taufahema)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate