NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Price; R v Rahim; R v Rizk; R v Taufahema (No 6) [2023] NSWSC 1663 Hearing dates: 29 November 2023 Date of orders: 29 November 2023 Decision date: 29 November 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McNaughton J Decision: The Court makes the following order: (1) The application for a Shepherd direction is refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – where application by accused seeking a Shepherd direction – whether it is an indispensable fact that the jury must find that the accused contemplated the offending would involve a knife – Crown not limited by way of a Shepherd direction – application refused Cases Cited: Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; [1990] HCA 56 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Crown) Lisa Anne Price (Accused) Bilal Rahim (Accused) Sherene Rizk (Accused) Viliami Bui Taufahema (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K Ratcliffe (Crown) T Quilter (Lisa Anne Price) M Hobart SC (Bilal Rahim) N Carroll (Sherene Rizk) A Evers (Viliami Bui Taufahema)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Sydney Side Lawyers (Lisa Anne Price) Australian Criminal & Family Lawyers (Bilal Rahim) Malouf Criminal Lawyers (Sherene Rizk) Criminal Law Group (Viliami Bui Taufahema) File Number(s): 2019/00399270, 2019/00388028, 2019/00397014, 2019/00388190 Publication restriction: No publication until the conclusion of the trial of Joseph Nehme
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate