NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Patterson (No 3) [2024] NSWSC 455 Hearing dates: 16 April 2024 Date of orders: 17 April 2024 Decision date: 17 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Dhanji J Decision: The application for a discharge of the jury is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – juries – application for discharge of jury – application precipitated by recent tragic events at Bondi Junction and Wakeley – media attention – media reports linking tragic event with mental illness and references to drug use – entitlement to a fair trial – jury will be exposed to expert opinions regarding the operation of mental illness and how a forensic patient is dealt with – accused's foreshadowed judge-alone application if jury is discharged – jury concerns – capacity to follow directions – question raised from a juror about a media article and whether permitted to show other jurors – counsel encounter with a juror – counsel in civilian clothes and without a wig – discharging the jury would be "an overly sensitive approach" – discharge would suggest a lack of trust in the jury system – no real risk established to the fairness of the trial – application refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1996 (NSW) Evidence Act 1996 (NSW) Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW) Cases Cited: Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427; [1996] HCA 22 Ilievski v R; Nolan v R (No 2) [2023] NSWCCA 248 Miller v The Crown [2015] NSWCCA 206; 252 A Crim R 486 Patel v The Queen (2012) 247 CLR 531; [2012] HCA 29 R v Ahola (No 6) [2013] NSWSC 703 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Crown) Jason Patterson (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K Ratcliffe (Crown) MP King (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate