NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Xu v Cao & Du Management Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 461 Hearing dates: 18 April 2024 Date of orders: 26 April 2024 Decision date: 26 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt AJ Decision: (1) The order finally pressed in relation to the Cao notice must be refused; (2) The costs of the Cao motion must be borne by the plaintiffs and cross defendants, as agreed or assessed; and (3) The costs of the Xu motion are to be costs in the cause. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – notice to produce the terms of claimed retainers – application to set aside notice to produce the terms of claimed retainers – whether the order pressed in relation to the notice to produce is required under either rr 21 or 34 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) – the order is not required – the notice to produce does not identify specific documents – the order pressed must be refused COSTS – a court will make an order for costs even when there has been no hearing on the merits and the moving party no longer wishes to proceed – order depends on how parties have acted – plaintiff effectively surrendered to defendant – costs of motion must be borne by plaintiff COSTS – all parties had a measure of success in relation to the motion – costs are to be costs in the cause Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 98 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 21.1(2), 21.9(2), 34.2 Cases Cited: Ahn v Toppro Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 221 Chandrasekaran v Western Sydney Local Health District [2023] NSWCA 219 Chapman v Luminis Pty Ltd [2003] FCAFC 162 Graphite Energy Pty Ltd v Lloyd Energy Systems Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1326 Mulley v Manifold (1959) 103 CLR 341; [1959] HCA 23 Norris v Kandiah [2007] NSWSC 1296 Patonga Beach Holdings Pty Ltd v Lyon [2009] NSWSC 869 Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6 Secretary of the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment v Blacktown City Council [2021] NSWCA 145 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Jaiqing Xu (Plaintiff) Cao & Du Management Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Howard Hao Ting Cao (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Li (Plaintiff) R Alkadamani (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate