NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Winston v Commonwealth of Australia [2024] NSWSC 464 Hearing dates: 15 April 2024 Date of orders: 26 April 2024 Decision date: 26 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt AJ Decision: (1) Mr Winston have leave to proceed on the pleading marked MFI 10; (2) The parties should confer about costs and the further conduct of the proceedings; (3) They should approach within 14 days with proposed orders and short written submissions in the event of any dispute; and (4) The matter will be listed before me for directions at 9.30 am on 10 May 2024. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – commencement of proceedings – further amended statement of claim raising additional claim – extension of time to bring proceedings previously granted – whether further extension required –– no further leave required –– whether leave to file amended statement of claim finally pressed should be given –– leave granted Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5B Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 57, 58, 64, 65 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 80 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), s 60G South East Asia Treaty Organisation (Privileges and Immunities) Regulations 1967 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 6.12, 14.7, 14.9, 14.14, 14.18, 14.19, 15.1, 15.5, 15.10 Cases Cited: Anchor Products Ltd v Hedges (1966) 115 CLR 493; [1966] HCA 70 Commonwealth of Australia v Smith [2007] NSWCA 168 Garzo v Liverpool / Campbelltown Christian School [2012] NSWCA 151 Groves v Commonwealth (1982) 150 CLR 113; [1982] HCA 2 Haskins v Commonwealth (2011) 244 CLR 22; [2011] HCA 28 Holt v Wynter (2000) 49 NSWLR 128; [2000] NSWCA 143 Multigroup Distribution Services P/L v TNT Aust P/L (1996) ATPR 41-522 Shaw Savill & Albion Co Ltd v Commonwealth (1940) 66 CLR 344; [1940] HCA 40 Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562; [2001] HCA 59 Winston v Commonwealth of Australia [2021] NSWSC 62 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Robert Wilson Winston (Plaintiff) Commonwealth of Australia (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A G Melick SC and C B Thomson (Plaintiff) M Fordham SC and A Lyons (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate