NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Joudo v Joudo (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 469 Hearing dates: On the papers, written submissions 17 April 2024 Date of orders: 24 April 2024 Decision date: 24 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Pike J Decision: (1) The costs of the application for leave to amend the cross-claim be costs in the cause. (2) The plaintiff pay the defendant's costs of the statement of claim, as assessed or agreed. (3) The cross-defendant pay the cross-claimants' costs of the amended cross-claim, as assessed or agreed. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – determination – whether reason for departing from usual rule – Calderbank offer – whether costs should be paid on indemnity basis by reason of rejection of offer – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: E Group Security Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1296 Hazeldene's Chicken Farm v Victorian WorkCover Authority (No 2) (2005) 13 VR 435, [2005] VSCA 298 Jones v Bradley (No 2) [2003] NSWCA 258 Miwa Pty Limited v Siantan Properties Pte Limited (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 344 SMEC Testing Services Pty Ltd v Campbelltown City Council [2000] NSWCA 323 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Costs Parties: Ravina Joudo (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Maria Joudo (Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Ronnie Joudo (Second Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: FFF Salama and B Flaherty (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) M Thompson (Defendant/Cross-Claimants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate