NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lobster and Co Trading Pty Ltd v TLC Industries Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 477 Hearing dates: 21 March 2024 Date of orders: 3 May 2024 Decision date: 03 May 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: (1) Grant leave to the plaintiff to appeal. (2) Uphold the appeal. (3) Set aside: (a) the judgment of Magistrate Manea in the Local Court given on 2 June 2023; and (b) the judgment of Magistrate Manea in the Local Court given on 16 August 2023. (4) Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $11,461.86. (5) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the hearing in the Local Court in the sum of $2,500. (6) The defendant is to pay 90% of the plaintiff's costs of these proceedings. (7) The defendant is to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW) if otherwise entitled. Catchwords: APPEALS – appeal from Local Court to Supreme Court – proceedings for recovery of approximately $11,500 – where defendant supplied 55 wood folding utility tables – where plaintiff alleges tables were defective from the outset – no evidence of neglect, misuse or excessive use – plaintiff claims cost of replacement and hire tables – implied statutory warranties – terms of use include 3 month commercial warranty – Magistrate dismissed claim – held Magistrate erred by (1) failing to determine how statutory warranties applied to the claim and (2) concluding there was no warranty about commercial use – errors mixed questions of law and fact – whether leave should be granted – where Magistrate also ordered plaintiff to pay costs of $15,000 plus disbursements of $6,130 – costs order almost double the amount of the claim – where prima facie position under Local Court Practice Note 1 is $2,500 maximum – sufficient injustice to grant leave to appeal – appeal upheld – judgment set aside JUDGMENT AND ORDERS – amending, varying and setting aside – whether proceedings should be remitted to the Local Court – further hearing inconsistent with s 56 of the Civil Procedure Act – where no cross-examination occurred – this Court in as good a position to determine the matter – no reason to reject unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff's director – plaintiff entitled to replacement and compensation – terms of the judgment varied – judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $11,461.86 Legislation Cited: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 2C Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 56 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law ss 3, 54 Local Court Act 2007 (NSW) ss 39, 40 Sale of Goods Act 1923 (NSW) s 19 Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW) s 6 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 50.16A Cases Cited: Ackerman v Morgan [2019] NSWSC 1250 Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission [2012] NSWCA 262; (2012) 224 A Crim R 94 Orr v Hunter Quarries Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCCA 39 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lobster and Co Trading Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) TLC Industries Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Fernon SC (Plaintiff) L Teoh (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate