NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Stamford Bridge SW6 Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 486 Hearing dates: 1-2 November 2023 Date of orders: 30 April 2024 Decision date: 30 April 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Williams J Decision: See [70] below. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – Service of statutory demand – Whether effective service by email – Time at which email taken to have been received – Whether application to set aside statutory demand and supporting affidavit filed and served under s 459G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) within 21-day statutory period after service of statutory demand Legislation Cited: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 28A Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 105A, 105B, 109X, 459A, 459B, 459C, 459E, 459G, 459H, 600G Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 161 Treasury Laws Amendment (Modernising Business Communications and Other Measures) Act 2023 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 3.7 Cases Cited: Commercial Union Assurance Co of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 In the matter of Bioaction Pty Ltd (2022) 402 ALR 542; [2022] FCA 436 Sandys Swim Pty Ltd v Morgan [2022] FCA 1574 Texts Cited: N/A Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stamford Bridge SW6 Pty Ltd ACN 627 482 928 (Plaintiff) Paul Andrew Cox (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr Thomas Williams (Solicitor) (Plaintiff) Mr Paul Cox (Litigant in Person) (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate