NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Supabarn Supermarkets Pty Ltd v Eyre Kingston Pty Ltd (in liq) [2024] NSWSC 489 Hearing dates: 18 April 2024; further evidence 23 April 2024; further written submissions 26, 28 and 29 April 2024 Decision date: 01 May 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Leave to proceed under s 471B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) refused Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – winding up – application for leave to proceed against company in liquidation – where unlikely that liquidators will be in a position to declare a dividend and accordingly adjudicate on any proofs of debt lodged in winding up – where liquidators have received and are considering offers for the purchase of the assignment of the company's chose against a third party – whether in these circumstances there is good reason to grant leave to proceed Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: BHG Nominees Pty Ltd v Ellis Young Investments Pty Ltd (1998) 16 ACLC 1539 Capita Financial Group Ltd v Rothwells Ltd (No 2) (1989) 15 ACLR 348 Clean Energy Regulator v E Connect Solar & Electrical Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 1082 Commonwealth of Australia v Davis Samuel Pty Ltd (No 5) (2008) 164 ACTR 1; [2008] ACTSC 124 DSG Holdings Australia Pty Ltd v Helenic Pty Ltd (2014) 86 NSWLR 293; [2014] NSWCA 96 Ibbco Trading Pty Ltd v HIH Casualty & General Insurance Ltd (in prov liq) (2001) 19 ACLC 1093; [2001] NSWSC 346 Re Gordon Grant & Grant Pty Ltd [1983] 2 Qd R 314 Re Jay-O-Bees Pty Ltd; Rosseau v Jay-O-Bees [2004] NSWSC 818; (2004) 50 ACSR 565 Snelgrove v Great Southern Managers Australia Ltd (in liq) [2010] WASC 2010 Sydlow Pty Ltd (in liq) v TG Kotselas Pty Ltd (1996) 65 FCR 234; [1996] FCA 233 Timbercorp Finance Pty Ltd (in liq) v Vivian (2016) 114 ACSR 198; [2016] VSC 338 Vagrand Pty Ltd (in liq) v Fielding (1993) 41 FCR 550; [1993] FCA 179 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Supabarn Supermarkets Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Applicant) Eyre Kingston Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (First Defendant/Respondent) DTM Investments (ACT) Pty Ltd (Second Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: S Hartford-Davis / B Smith (Plaintiff/Applicant) J C Giles SC / N D Riordan (Second Defendant/Applicant) J Burnett (Respondent Liquidator)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate