NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Nehme [2024] NSWSC 512 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 01 March 2024 Decision date: 04 March 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McNaughton J Decision: The Court makes the following orders: (1) The portion of item 164 either in its original form or in its suggested amended form is excluded; (2) Subject to the excisions of the words "I do everything with this guy, bro" and "he saved my life maybe three times" the portion of item 194 is admissible; (3) The portion of item 207 is admissible. Catchwords: CRIME – admissibility – evidence – telephone intercept material relating to violence, drugs and participation of others – where accused objects to the content of certain telephone intercept material – whether probative value of certain telephone intercept material is outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to the accused – Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 137 Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 130A Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 137 Cases Cited: R v Nehme (No 4) [2022] NSWSC 202 R v Nehme, Price, Rahim, Taufahema and Rizk (No 4) [2023] NSWSC 932 R v Nehme; R v Price; R v Rahim; R v Rizk; R v Taufahema (No 4) [2024] NSWSC 451 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Crown) Joseph Nehme (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K Ratcliffe (Crown) D Dalton SC / T Weller-Wong (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate