NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Hogan [2024] NSWCATAP 77 Hearing dates: 23 February 2024 Date of orders: 23 February 2024 Decision date: 23 February 2024 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: R Seiden SC, Principal Member D Robertson, Senior Member Decision: (1) The appeal is allowed. (2) Order 1 of 2 Nov 2023 is set aside. In lieu the decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - firearms regulation – revocation of existing firearms licence after conviction for an offence relating to the possession of a firearm by reason of which a further licence could not be issued – whether there is a requirement that there be special or exceptional circumstances before a firearms licence may be retained after conviction for an offence which will preclude the renewal of the licence – held there is no such requirement but there must be some feature of the circumstances that justifies the position that the licensee should retain their licence APPEAL – Civil and Administrative Tribunal – questions of law Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Firearms Regulation 2017 (NSW) Cases Cited: AAI Ltd trading as GIO as agent for the Nominal Defendant v McGiffen [2016] NSWCA 229 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond and Others (1990) 170 CLR 321; [1990] HCA 33 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Bevan v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police of Service [2004] NSWADT 1 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; [1995] HCA 58 CUB Australia Holding Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2021) 385 ALR 731; [2021] FCA 43 Cusumano v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSWADT 50 Ferella v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2014] NSWCA 378 Grant v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 158 Gautam v Health Care Complaints Commission [2021] NSWCA 85 Hermes Nominees Pty Ltd v Shepherd [2024] NSWCATAP 36 Jegatheeswaran v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2001) 194 ALR 263; [2001] FCA 865 Johns v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2021] NSWCATAD 283 Kudrynski v Orange City Council [2024] NSWCA 33 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Neat Domestic Trading Pty Ltd v AWB Ltd (2003) 216 CLR 277; [2003] HCA 35 New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation v Orr (2019) 100 NSWLR 578; [2019] NSWCA 231 Nu-Stone Building Ltd v McInerney [2023] NSWSC 940 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Starr v Johnston [2023] NSWCATAP 190 Uzelac v Commissioner of Police [2003] NSWADT 226 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480; [2013] HCA 43 Yuanda Vic Pty Ltd v Façade Designs International Pty Ltd [2021] VSCA 44 Texts Cited: New South Wales, Parliamentary Debates, Legislative Assembly, 21 June 1996 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Appellant: Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force Respondent: David Wayne Hogan Representation: Counsel: C Langford (Appellant) No appearance (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate