NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rahman v Rahman (No 1) [2024] NSWCA 108 Hearing dates: 2 May 2024 Decision date: 02 May 2024 Before: Leeming JA at [1], [18]; White JA at [16]; Mitchelmore JA at [17] Decision: 1. Notice of motion filed 19 April 2024 dismissed. 2. Costs reserved. Catchwords: PRACTICE – application for adjournment – separate proceedings challenging separate decisions of District Court concerning apprehended domestic violence orders – one decision refused an order sought by husband against estranged wife – other decision granted an order sought by wife against estranged husband – husband sought judicial review of both decisions – whether proceeding set down for hearing months earlier should be vacated so as to be heard together with other proceeding which did not have a hearing date – despite parties to proceedings being same, each raised different issues and turned on different evidence – application refused Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Fahmid Rahman (Applicant) Mita Farjina Rahman (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant (self-represented) M J Lewis and K Hooper (Respondent)
Solicitors: MIC Lawyers (Applicant) N Reuben (Respondent) File Number(s): 2023/345709 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 14 August 2023 Before: M L Williams SC DCJ File Number(s): 2020/00104318
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate