NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: G&S Engineering Services Pty Ltd v MACH Energy Australia Pty Ltd (No 12) [2024] NSWSC 552 Hearing dates: 8 May 2024 Decision date: 10 May 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Defendants/Cross-Claimants given leave to file and serve Fourth Further Amended Cross-Claim List Statement; parties to confer and agree on proposed revised directions needed to ready matter for trial Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – pleadings – amendment – late application for amendment – where cross-claimants allege that but for cross-defendants' alleged misleading or deceptive conduct it would have engaged alternative contractor to construct coal handling plant in accordance with number of counter factual circumstances – where cross-defendants' experts identified factual operational matters that would allegedly also occur in the counterfactual circumstances – where cross-defendants amended their Cross-Claim Response to reflect these matters – where cross-claimants seek to amend Cross-Claim List Statement to meet that claim – where cross-claimants' current case might fail absent such amendment – where trial date imminent – whether directions can be made to ensure cross-defendants not prejudiced Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law Cases Cited: G&S Engineering Services Pty Ltd v MACH Energy Australia Pty Ltd (No 6) [2022] NSWSC 628 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: G&S Engineering Services Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) DRA Pacific Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) DRA Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd (Third Cross-Defendant) DRA Global Limited (Fourth Cross-Defendant) MACH Energy Australia Pty Ltd (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) MACH Mount Pleasant Operations Pty Ltd (Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) J.C.D. Australia Pty Ltd (Third Defendant/Third Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: M Lyons / D Johnson (Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants/Respondents) N Kidd SC / M Doyle (Defendants/Cross-Claimants/Applicants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate