NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wilson v Mirus Australia Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCA 111 Hearing dates: 10 May 2024 Date of orders: 10 May 2024 Decision date: 10 May 2024 Before: Gleeson JA; Basten AJA Decision: (1) Leave to appeal refused and summons filed 5 March 2024 is dismissed. (2) The applicant to pay the respondent's costs of the application in this Court. Catchwords: APPEAL AND REVIEW – leave to appeal – proposed appeal from judgment disposing of appeal from review of a costs assessment – costs disputes as satellite litigation – fourth hearing with respect to costs assessment – need for strong likelihood that no further proceeding would result – leave refused COSTS – assessment of costs – review of costs assessment by review panel – functions of review panel – whether nature of review changed in 2014 with enactment of Uniform Law – whether review panel has function of determining the costs of the review and who should pay them Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), s 375 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW), ss 73, 78, 85, 89 Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), ss 169, 198, 199 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51.12 Cases Cited: Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 303; [2013] HCA 46 Housman v Camuglia (2021) 104 NSWLR 615; [2021] NSWCA 106 Ramsay v Gatland [2022] NSWSC 1514 Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services v Smith (2017) 95 NSWLR 597; [2017] NSWCA 206 Wende v Horwath (NSW) Pty Ltd (2014) 86 NSWLR 674; [2014] NSWCA 170 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Simon Wilson (Applicant) Mirus Australia Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Doyle Gray (Applicant) J Bartos (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate