NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sayer-Jones v R [2024] NSWCCA 73 Hearing dates: 6 May 2024 Date of orders: 15 May 2024 Decision date: 15 May 2024 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Campbell J at [7]; N Adams J at [13]. Decision: (1) Leave to appeal under s 5F(3)(a) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – leave to appeal interlocutory decision of District Court setting aside subpoenas issued by applicant and refusing to grant applicant leave to issue further subpoena – relevance of delay on sentence – delay as a mitigating factor – no error established – application refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 192E(1)(b), 192G, 319 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 52(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), Ch 4 Pt 3, s 298 Prevention of Oil Pollution Act 1971 (UK), s 2(1) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.3(1) Cases Cited: Alexandroaia v R (1995) 81 A Crim R 286 Coles v R [2016] NSWCCA 32 DAO v The Queen (2011) 81 NSWLR 568; [2011] NSWCCA 63 Sayer-Jones v The Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2019] NSWSC 1615 Decision Restricted [2022] NSWCCA 99 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Pratten (No 2) (2017) 94 NSWLR 194; [2017] NSWCCA 42 FT (a pseudonym) v The King [2024] VSCA 90 GLJ v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Lismore [2023] HCA 32; 97 ALJR 857 Diocese of Lismore [2023] HCA 32; 97 ALJR 857 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Jamieson v The Queen (1993) 177 CLR 574; [1993] HCA 48 Khanna v Woolworths Group Ltd [2022] NSWCA 94 King v R (1998) 99 A Crim R 288 Koschier v R [2024] NSWCCA 24 Mill v R (1988) 166 CLR 59; [1988] HCA 70 R v Blanco [1999] NSWCCA 121; (1999) 106 A Crim R 303 R v Carpenter [2022] ACTSC 6 R v DK [2023] NSWCCA 281 R v Donald [2013] NSWCCA 238 R v Gay [2002] NSWCCA 6; (2002) 49 ATR 78 R v Haque [2022] ACTSC 10 R v Karageorge (1998) 146 FLR 100; (1998) 103 A Crim R 157 R v Obeid [2018] NSWSC 1024 R v Schwabegger [1998] 4 VR 649; (1997) 38 ATR 30 R v Thames Magistrates' Court; ex parte Polemis [1974] 2 All ER 1219 R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 R v Wong [2002] NSWCCA 527; (2002) 137 A Crim R 120 Re Will of Gilbert (1946) 46 SR (NSW) 318 Rohan v R [2018] NSWCCA 89 Sabra v R [2015] NSWCCA 38; (2015) 257 A Crim R 33 Sayer-Jones v R [2024] NSWCCA 54 Sayer-Jones v The Director of Public Prosecutions [2019] NSWSC 1615 Scook v R [2008] WASCA 114; (2008) 185 A Crim R 164 Secretary of the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment v Blacktown City Council [2021] NSWCA 145 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Sayer-Jones (Applicant) (self-represented) Rex (Crown) (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A L Bonnor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate