NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kennedy v Malhotra [2024] NSWSC 576 Hearing dates: 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 April 2024 Date of orders: 15 May 2024 Decision date: 15 May 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Cavanagh J Decision: (1) Judgment for the defendant. (2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs. (3) Grant liberty to apply should either party seek a variation of the costs order. Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE – General practitioner and patient –where plaintiff alleges that her general practitioner failed to advise or inform her of the need for cervical screening – where plaintiff now suffers from cervical cancer – whether the defendant was obliged to "follow up" on whether the plaintiff had undergone cervical screening – whether s 5O of the Civil Liability Act applies NEGLIGENCE – Causation – Medical negligence –whether, absent the defendant's negligence, the plaintiff would have undergone cervical screening at a time when her condition was treatable NEGLIGENCE – Damages – damages sought for both economic and non-economic loss – assessment of likely future earning capacity Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5B, 5D, 5E, 5O Cases Cited: Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582 Grinham v Tabro Meats Pty Ltd [2012] VSC 491 Husher v Husher (1999) CLR 138 Kite v Malycha (1998) 71 SASR 321 Koziol v Anasson [1997] FCA 803 O'Gorman v Sydney South West Area Health Service [2008] NSWSC 1127 Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW v Dederer (2007) 234 CLR 330 Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479 Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and Maudsley Hospital [1984] AC 871 Skelton v Collins (1966) 115 CLR 94 at 121 South-western Sydney Local Health District v Gould [2018] 97 NSWLR 513 Sparks v Hobson (2018) Aust Torts Reports 82-372 Tai v Hatzistavrou [1999] NSWCA 306 Young v Central Australian Aboriginal Congress [2008] NTSC 47 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Athena Kennedy (Plaintiff) Deepika Malhotra (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Toomey SC and J Thompson (Plaintiff) M Gerace SC (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate