NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Stephinson [2024] NSWCATAP 84 Hearing dates: 19 April 2024 Date of orders: 16 May 2024 Decision date: 16 May 2024 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Dr R Dubler SC, Senior Member A Boxall, Senior Member Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is refused. (2) Appeal dismissed. (3) The Appellant's application for costs is refused. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — firearms — whether reasons were adequate — whether Tribunal misconstrued the Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Cases Cited: Azriel v NSW Land & Housing Corporation [2006] NSWCA 372 Bruce v Cole [1998] 45 NSWLR 163 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Gautam v Health Care Complaints Commission [2021] NSWCA 85 NSW Land and Housing Corporation v Orr [2019] NSWCA 231 Pollard v RRR Corporation Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 110 Volkswagen Group Australia Pty Ltd v Saad [2022] NSWCATAP 133 Ward v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2000] NSWADT 28 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gregory William Stephinson (Appellant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Coffey (Appellant) W J Wilcher (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate