NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Madsen v Darmali (No 3) [2024] NSWSC 582 Hearing dates: 3 May 2024 Date of orders: 17 May 2024 Decision date: 17 May 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Expedition List Before: Rees J Decision: Dismiss motion to vary orders by consent. Catchwords: LEGAL PROFESSION – leave to serve submissions after hearing – defendant serves submissions beyond scope of leave – principles at [4]-[7] – expedited matter – urgent application – plaintiff unable to respond to submissions in time – judge disregards unauthorised submissions – cost order excises costs of unauthorised submissions – plaintiff later consents to pay these costs "to avoid a fight" – serving submissions without leave is a professional conduct issue, unsuitable to be remedied by consent – access to transcript no answer. PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS – reasonable opportunity to be heard – principles at [9]-[13] – court not obliged to hear every submission counsel wishes to make in full – the court may cut short one party's submissions to ensure that the other party also has a reasonable opportunity to be heard – no justification for serving submissions without leave. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 36.15(2) Cases Cited: Armet v Browne [2024] WASCA 44 Bale v Mills (2011) 81 NSWLR 498; [2011] NSWCA 226 Bull v Lee (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 362 C v W [2015] NSWSC 1774 Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd (No 1) (1981) 147 CLR 246 Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) v Quirk (2023) 414 ALR 516 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) (2003) 214 CLR 318 HT v The Queen (2019) 269 CLR 403 Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd (2015) 238 FCR 209 Huynh v Attorney General (NSW) (2021) 107 NSWLR 75 Isicob Pty Ltd v Baulderstone Hornibrook (Qld) Pty Ltd (in liq) (2001) 17 BCL 198; [2001] QSC 064 Jakaj v Kinnane [2019] ACTSC 71 Madsen v Darmali [2024] NSWSC 76 Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 357 NT Power Generation Pty Ltd v Power and Water Authority (2004) 219 CLR 90 Owners - Strata Plan No 74442 v Harrison [2023] NSWCATAP 144 R v Tocknell (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 28 May 1998, Hulme J, unrep) Sun Newspapers Pty Ltd v Brisbane TV Ltd (1989) 92 ALR 535 Zan & Wen (No 2) [2023] FedCFamC1A 130 Texts Cited: Murray Gleeson, "The Judicial Method: Essentials and Inessentials" (2010) 9(4) The Judicial Review 377 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Benny Madsen (Plaintiff) David Darmali (First Defendant) Chu Li (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr MA Friedgut (First and Second Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate