NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Grant v R [2024] NSWCCA 78 Hearing dates: 24 April 2024 Date of orders: 24 May 2024 Decision date: 24 May 2024 Before: Davies J at [1]; N Adams J at [2]; McNaughton J at [3] Decision: (1) Ground 1 be upheld. (2) The appeal be allowed. (3) The appellant's conviction for the offence contrary to s 66EA Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) be quashed. (4) In lieu thereof, an order of acquittal is entered. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal pursuant to s 5(1) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – historical sexual acts – where female teacher maintained a sexual relationship with a child – where appellant pleaded guilty in the District Court – whether the conviction was a miscarriage of justice – whether appellant was convicted of a charge founded upon charges for which the appellant could not lawfully be convicted Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 66EA, 81 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 166 Cases Cited: Grant v R [2024] NSWCCA 30 JAD v R [2012] NSWCCA 73 Lam v R [2024] NSWCCA 6 Livbuild Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council [2017] NSWCCA 255 Meissner v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 132; [1995] HCA 41 R v Grant [2022] NSWDC 718 R v Liberti (1991) 55 A Crim R 120 Texts Cited: New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 6 June 2018 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gaye Grant (Appellant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Boland (Appellant) G Newton SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate